‘The only poor people today live in less developed nations’ Essay Example Essay Example

‘The only poor people today live in less developed nations’ Essay Example Paper ‘The only poor people today live in less developed nations’ Essay Introduction Poverty is subjective and based on perception and therefore difficult to provide a universal definition. To be poor is not completely about a lack of financial resource; this is just one aspect of poverty, as the adage goes ‘money can’t buy you everything’. Poverty can be the result of a wide array of difficulties and social problems. For example, people can feel poorer because they are at an intellectual deficit due to not having access of equality to education services or perhaps they can be socially poor because they themselves have chosen to withdraw from society. It is wrong to argue that developing nations have the monopoly on poverty and that the disadvantaged in developed nations are merely victims of inequality in society. This essay seeks to demonstrate that despite the emergence of a sophisticated welfare infrastructure in the developed world and the subjective nature of poverty, the poor remain the world over, victims of disparity in their society and an inability to alleviate their situation. To know where poor people live we must first understand what poverty is. The definition has undergone many changes throughout its use, reliant on the attitude of the person using it and the context of the environment it is applied to. For instance, Bentham argued in the 19th century that poverty was to be equated with labour, ‘poverty is the condition of everyone who is forced to use their labour for subsistence’. Bentham would therefore be horrified at the levels of poverty today by his definition. In recent times poverty is a much broader issue, not just related to income but problems in society that block access to education or even people who are poor in terms of the amount of time they have to exist outside of work and participate in society. To complicate matters, poverty is intertwined with identity, dependence on social networks and a plethora of emotive opinions and statistics. Poverty therefore means something differe nt to everyone, from their own experience to their perception of others. Yet there is general consensus that poverty is connected to experiencing deprivation (of varying levels and importance) and often hardship. ‘The only poor people today live in less developed nations’ Essay Body Paragraphs Poverty is a condition that affects the developing world to a severe extent. It is most certainly linked to a lack of income and resource but also linked to being socially, emotionally or even aspirationally poorer. Sporadic campaigns to alleviate the situation reveal the extent of the problem; people in the west are shocked by TV footage of famine victims and their circumstances, they send some money and then they turn off the television grateful they do not suffer in the same way. Poverty therefore means something different in the developing world; it is more closely related to abject suffering, being in want of often the most basic requirements in order to survive. To illustrate this, 10m children die every year from preventable diseases (UNICEF, 2005), unable to obtain sufficient access to medical resource and by the time you finish reading this sentence someone in a developing nation has died from hunger (UN, 2005). The poor in developing nations are victims of their environment , often unable to escape the maelstrom of chaos, disease, corruption and apathy that impacts on them (Make Poverty History, 2005). Inequality still exists in these countries; there is a divide between the rich and the poor, a recent World Bank report indicates that the top 10% of Kenyans earn 47% of the national income leaving the remainder with insufficient money to purchase food able to meet the minimum daily calorie requirements of an adult male. Developing nations are less concerned by the disparity between rich and poor than developed nations are; the sheer volume of people in poverty makes this of minimal consequence. However developed nations often link the plight of the less affluent in society with the concept of social justice and equality. There has been a land shift in attitude towards poverty in developing nations, for example the origins of the British welfare state date back to 16th century Poor Laws primarily focused on maintaining public order (Harris, B 2004). Welf are provision in 2005 is about a partnership between state and individual, where it is the responsibility of the individual to help himself, while the state is there to provide opportunities and alternatives to the poverty many have had little chance to escape. This relationship between citizen and state is known as the ‘New Deal’ and it is recognition in the UK that poverty is related to inequality and lack of opportunity. Few people in developed societies such as Britain experience the problems that affect the poor in a developing nation. Poverty is therefore subjective and can be much more extreme in third-world countries than is possible to appreciate. Despite the prevalence and extremity of poverty in developing nations, there are also examples of poverty in the developed world too. For example, it is anticipated that in the UK up to five thousand people a year sleep rough at some point (Shelter, 2005) and are unable to lift themselves out of poverty. In addition t o this it has been revealed that the number of ‘have-nots’ in the UK, despite being the fourth wealthiest nation, is much larger than anticipated. Although state benefits ensure that the most vulnerable in society do not face starvation or homelessness, the average recipient of state benefit has to survive on à ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½3 a day (Family Welfare Association, 2005). The situation is replicated throughout the developed world, as the events that followed in the wake of hurricane Katrina in September 2005 prove. Despite the USA being the richest nation on earth, the poor who could not escape New Orleans before the hurricane hit were left stranded and to fend for themselves. Predominantly poor black families were effectively left behind in this highly developed country, some 35% of black households lack a car, and were forced to cope with the flooding and civil disobedience that ensued (The Economist, 2005). Despite our affluence, in comparison to developing countries, there are many examples of how people experience real poverty and fall through the cracks of society in the developed world. In 1999, Tony Blair made a pledge to end child poverty within twenty years in the UK. The first annual government report, Poverty and Social Exclusion, in the same year included 40 indicators of poverty. The sheer number of indicators demonstrates how hard it is to define poverty. The accepted view that households who live on half than average income are in poverty revealed that in 1995-96 almost one quarter of Britons were to be considered poor (The Economist, 1999). The research goes further to say that 4.6m children lived below the poverty line, which is about 34% of the total number of children in the UK at that time. Research shows poverty is increasing, for example in 1979 there were only 9% of households and 10% of children living on less than half average incomes. An alternative is to try and fix a poverty line which does not change as economies get richer à ¢â‚¬â€œ enough to meet a generally acceptable definition of basic necessities. The incomes of the poorest 10% of the population in 1995-96 were slightly lower, after housing costs, than those of their counterparts in 1979; when adjusted by inflation. However the indicators selected in 1999 show significant improvements since the mid-1990s in other areas. The proportion of working age people who live in a household where no-one works has fallen from a peak of 14.1 per cent in the mid-1990s to 11.8 per cent in 2002. The proportion of working age people without a qualification has also fallen, to 15.2 per cent in 2002. In 2000/2001, 30 per cent of children were living in households with relative low incomes, down from 34 per cent in 1996/97. In 1998, 50 per cent of single elderly households experienced fuel poverty, before housing benefit and income support for mortgage interest, down from 61 per cent in 1996 (National Statistics, 2005). With this method we can see that while things ar e improving there are still poor people in Britain, and that six years after Tony Blair’s pledge, child poverty has declined only by 4%. It is not only economic hardship or the individuals and groups that fall through the system that indicate poverty in the developed world. The man who donated some money to a famine appeal and then turned off his television is very thankful he is not in the same circumstances. However, he has some troubles of his own, though not nearly to the same extent. He has comparative needs, he believes he needs a new car because the old one keeps breaking down and he has spent a fortune trying to fix it. He’d like to be able to spend more time with his children; but he doesn’t have enough hours in the day. Another thing dwells on his mind; his youngest child isn’t at a very good school, so he has to pay out for extra lessons because the school he wanted to send his child to is oversubscribed. His wife feels the same, but anyway she ’s too exhausted to think about that now, she’s just come in from work, her salary is swallowed up by the bills from the old people’s home that cares for her elderly mother. Societies in the developed world create a different kind of poverty, where there is a deficit of time and people feel trapped – working longer hours for a diminished return. The 1997 British Social Attitudes survey showed that 62% of respondents were dissatisfied with their quality of life, citing many of the examples listed above. Poverty therefore comes in a number of guises affecting all members of society in different ways. In conclusion, poor people are found the world over, not only in less developed nations. The level and density may be greater in the developing world but this does not support the argument that as a consequence poverty does not jostle against the affluence of developed nations. There have been several examples, such as the hurricane in New Orleans, that have re plicated the levels of poverty and misery felt by developing nations, in developed countries. Poverty is subjective; it is reliant on individuals’ perceptions of how much of what they either want or need is available to them. It can affect anyone of us at some point, inflicted by external factors such as drought or famine, loss of income or by our liberty becoming suffocated or squeezed. All of these factors can make someone feel poorer than their neighbour and feel excluded from society. The current government has made significant steps towards limiting poverty in the UK, helping those who are cash-poor to greater opportunity. However, developed society must also create new ways to help individuals who may be cash-rich but time-poor, who feel there is no mechanism to cope with the pressures and demands of modern life. It is often quoted that the poor will always be with us, and I believe they will be found in every society where there is a finite amount of resource and an en dless supply of wants and needs that can conflict with each other. We will write a custom essay sample on ‘The only poor people today live in less developed nations’ Essay Example specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on ‘The only poor people today live in less developed nations’ Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on ‘The only poor people today live in less developed nations’ Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer

Essay on Water ShortagesEssay Writing Service

Essay on Water ShortagesEssay Writing Service Essay on Water Shortages Essay on Water ShortagesThe article under discussion deals with the problem of water scarcity in the US. It primarily states that water is undoubtedly an irreplaceable resource that is used not only by the population of the US, but also in the spheres of agriculture and manufacturing. The article gives many examples of how the US government strives for solving this problem, but all efforts seem to be insufficient. Thus, there have been implemented a number of legal acts aimed at enhancing the quality of water in many regions of America. Among the acts named by the author are the 1972 Clean Water Act, the 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act and some others (Weeks 531). These acts were purposed to not only solve the problem of water shortage, but also deal with the corresponding issue of water pollution that also poses a threat in many regions of the US. However, it can be stated that although such measures have undoubtedly brought about obvious progress, the US still faces a problem of high urgency and severity – water shortage.The article further explores on the subject admitting that nowadays, the US high-tech and energy production suffer from the problem of water scarcity more and more. This problem is also of high importance for the agricultural sphere of the country. Furthermore, not all regions of the US fully understand their responsibility for this issue. Thus, while certain regions of the country pay much attention to the conservation of water, others do not even measure the extent of water spent for household purposes (Weeks 532). Consequently, the problem cannot be solved if the situation does not change for the better. It is evident that although more and more citizens of America feel their responsibility for the amount of water they consume, there are always those who neglect this issue, and with the ever rising population, the problem seems to remain unsolved without any progress.In general, it can be said that the author of the article investigate s the ever growing problem of water shortage in the US to full extent. It provides full-fledged data on the issue of water scarcity and the corresponding problem of water pollution within the country. As for my personal point of view on the subject, I need to say that in regard to the above-stated problems, there is a consequential issue that has been briefly mentioned in the article as well. That is the negligence of the government to take into consideration the ever rising problem of dumping wastes into the lakes and rivers by the industrial enterprises. Although, this problem has been considered by a number of legal acts advocating for the cleanness of drinking water, it still remains unsolved.All this leads to a conclusion that even though the US has a number of environmental laws, the issues of water pollution and water shortage are not of the utmost importance for the US government. In this regard, it can be said that the legal authorities of the country do not pay enough atte ntion to the environmental issues as they always have some more important problems to solve. But it should be admitted that it is environmental problems that pose the major threat not only for the population of the US, but for other nations of the world as well. It can be concluded that the US certainly faces the water crisis and immediate actions should be taken to prevent its progress.

The Clipper Chip Controversy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Clipper Chip Controversy - Essay Example The clipper managed to  perform  the above task with the  help  of certain numerical keys. Controversy sprung from the fact that the US government sought to  retain  exclusive  but regulated knowledge of such algorithms. That way, the government could eavesdrop on any conversation it considered  suspect. However, this would only be possible with a nod from the courts. As it happened, from ordinary citizens through  business  people to senior military personnel,  virtually  everyone had an opinion on the issue. On one hand,  there were civil libertarians glibly expressing their fear of the technology  being used  to  aid  a  big  brother regime that would  easily  stifle freedom of speech. On the other, cogent arguments in favor of keeping an eye and ear on the criminal  activity  were made. This paper endeavors to present arguments on both sides of the divide all through to the final part of the debacle. The privacy constituency rooted it s opposition to the clipper on the way it  was envisioned  to operate. ... stance if an ordinary citizen happened to stumble upon damaging information about the government, it was an  act  in futility for  him or her  to  attempt  to  pass  an encrypted  dossier  to someone in the media. The government’s operatives would work relentlessly to  intercept  it before some loudmouth spilled the beans if it (the government) knew about the leak. In such situations, no one was willing to tell the truth about anyone because the risk of  being caught  would be  unbearable. Similarly, it is quite thinkable that the government would use its backdoor privileges to access information otherwise supposed to be  confidential  about political competitors. In short, the charge from this end was that the chances of a  regime  turning  rogue  and harassing people for having unfavorable opinions, are exceptionally high with the clipper chip. The Clinton Administration countered this line of reasoning with a poignant statement that read; unfortunately, the same encryption technology that can help Americans protect  business  secrets and personal privacy can also be used by terrorists, drug dealers and other criminals (Lewis 26). Even during those pre-9/11 days, it was easy to see how a determined and sophisticated terrorist could benefit from access to encryption technology that no man, woman or  spirit  can penetrate. Plans to smuggle  would-be  murderers, take  flight  lessons, hijack airplanes and  crash  them into skyscrapers would be swapped across cyberspace without detection. Although the usefulness of the clipper in matters of defense is  somewhat  clear, its  inadequacy  is even clearer. Thoughtful opponents of the clipper observed no criminals or terrorists smart enough to use a  system  to use data encryption would be  dumb  enough to use